Web"Dashrath Roop Singh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others", Criminal Appeal No. 2287 of 2009, the original complaint has to be returned to the respondent (original complainant) to be presented in the jurisdiction of concerned WebMahabir Singh Date: 2014.08.07 12:36:46 IST Reason: ... In that case it was held that by reading the proviso consistent with the provisions of Section 88 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, the object of ... . 2287/2009 DASHRATH RUPSINGH RATHOD Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. …
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs State Of Maharashtra on 1 August, …
WebJan 23, 2024 · In respect of this case, bench of two judges of the Supreme Court held that the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act could only be committed with the conclusion … WebIn Dashrath Roop Singh Rathod Vs. State Of Maharashtra (2014) 9 SCC 129, overruling the law set forth by the Supreme Court previously, identified following ingredients of offence under Section 138 of the Act:- (I) Drawing of the cheque; ... In the case at hand, the main emphasis laid by the learned counsel for the applicant is that no illegal ... tshd remote
India: Cheque Dishonor – SC Redefined Jurisdiction Of Courts
WebMay 17, 2024 · In the case of Dashrath Roopsingh Rathore v. State of Maharastra (Criminal Appeal No. 2287/2009), decided by a bench of three Hon'ble Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the... RAJ PETROLIUM THRO' YATINBHAI NAVINCHANDRA SANGHVI v. STATE OF GUJARAT 6 Court: Gujarat High Court Date: Apr 15, 2015 Cited By: 0 … WebNov 3, 2024 · Case name: Dashrath Roopsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... However, this ruling was overruled by the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Dashrath Roop Singh case. Conclusion . A negotiable instrument is supposed to be dishonored when the drawee declined to receive it or to make a sum upon it. In both cases, the holder is … WebSep 21, 2024 · - By Yatharth Chauhan philosophers of the world