site stats

Arjun panditrao khotkar vs kailash

Web28 ago 2024 · The Apex Court in the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors.[1] brought an end to an ongoing conflict w.r.t. interpretation of Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (“Evidence Act”). The conundrum lies between division bench judgment in the case of Shafhi Mohammad v. Web15 lug 2024 · Ajrun Pantirao Khotkar vs. Kailash Gorantyal & Ors. (Civil Appeal Nos. 20825-20826 of 2024) was referred to a bench of three Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court by a Division Bench. The reference was made with regard to the interpretation of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Since the law laid down in State v.

Section 65 B Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal ...

Web25. In the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal re- ported in (2024) 7 SCC 1, decided on 14.07.2024, a three Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to answer a reference regarding the position of law relating to the interpretation of Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, 1872. WebARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR vs. KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL 2024 Latest Caselaw 421 SC. Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 421 SC Judgement Date ... These … kathleen horohoe attorney https://all-walls.com

Recent Landmark Cases under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

WebArjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kusahanrao Goryantal ( MANU/SC/0521/ 2024 (SC) Indian Evidence , Act 1872 S.65B – Admissibility of electronic records – Data – … WebArjun Panditrao Khotkar vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, Civil Appeal Nos. 20825-20826 of 2024. ISSUES RAISED. Issue 1: WHETHER PHOTOGRAPH IS INADMISSABLE AS EVIDENCE. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS. Issue 1: WHETHER PHOTOGRAPH IS INADMISSABLE AS EVIDENCE. Web22 feb 2024 · Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal & Ors., Civil Appeal Nos. 20825 – 20826 of 2024, 2407 of 2024 and 3696 of 2024, decided on July … lay har cheng md

Crime Scene Photography/Videography- Supreme Court Directs …

Category:landmark case arjun panditrao landmark judgement on ... - Studocu

Tags:Arjun panditrao khotkar vs kailash

Arjun panditrao khotkar vs kailash

Proving Electronic Evidence under the Evidence Act

WebARJUN AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3696 OF 2024 KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR ...RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R In Anvar P.V. vs. P.K. Basheer and others, (2014) 10 SCC 473, a three Judges Bench of this Court held: “16. It is further clarified … Web14 lug 2024 · The bench also overruled the 2024 decision delivered by a 2-judge bench in the case Shafi Mohammad vs State of Himachal Pradesh. ... (Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and ...

Arjun panditrao khotkar vs kailash

Did you know?

WebDownload / Print SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Present: Justice R. F. Nariman, Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR – … Web• I did a case study on Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs Kailash Gorantyal pertaining to admissibility of electronic evidence (Section 65B) under the Indian Evidence Act. • I did a case study on Amazon Vs Future Group pertaining to enforcement of Emergency Arbitration Award in India under Section 17(1) of the Arbitration Act

WebContributed by: P&A Law Offices On 14th July 2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) delivered its judgment in the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. … Web28 ott 2024 · The Arjun Panditrao Khotkar case. The Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantya case in 2024 assumed importance as it was then that the Supreme Court clarified that a certificate is a pre-condition to the admissibility of evidence by way of electronic record under Section 65B of the Act.

Web25 ago 2024 · The Apex Court in the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors. 1 brought an end to an ongoing conflict w.r.t. interpretation of Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ("Evidence Act"). The conundrum lies between division bench judgment in the case of Shafhi Mohammad v.State of Himachal Pradesh 2 … Web14 gen 2024 · The recent judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the matter of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and others (2024) 7 SCC 1 has held that a certificate Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act is required when reliance is being placed upon electronic record.

Web1 giorno fa · central govt counsel for union of india. govt advocate for state of punjab. punjab & haryana high court. supreme court of india. 1y

Web21 nov 2024 · [NOTE: Overruling the 2024 decision delivered by a 2-judge bench in the instant case, the Supreme Court had, in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and others finally held that ... lay har cheng atriumWebArjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kusahanrao Goryantal ( MANU/SC/0521/ 2024 (SC) Indian Evidence , Act 1872 S.65B – Admissibility of electronic records – Data – Electronic Records – Document – furnishing certificate [S.2(t), 65A, 65B(4), 69, Information Technology Act, 2000, 67C, Representation of the People Act , 1951 , S.80, 81] kathleen huddy couchWebNon è possibile visualizzare una descrizione perché il sito non lo consente. kathleen huffman chiropractorWeb14 lug 2024 · [Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 571 , decided on 14.07.2024] Tweet. Click to share on Facebook (Opens in … lay hardwood floor on concreteWeb26 lug 2024 · Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal on 26 July, 2024. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL … kathleen hughes actress picturesWeb11 apr 2024 · I. INTRODUCTION: On July 14, 2024, a three-judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) delivered its decision in the case of Arjun … kathleen hughes obituaryWeb20 lug 2024 · A Three Justices’ Bench of the Supreme Court delivered a much-awaited decision in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos. 20825-26 of 2024, decided on 14.07.2024 (“Arjun Panditrao“)].The issue referred to the Three Justices was an apparent conflict that had emerged in the position of law on the … kathleen insley plattsburgh ny